Tom Joyner VS. Tavis Smiley and Cornel West Round II


If you have not heard or read there is a big public feud between some of our most respected Black kings and it keep getting deeper? I read this letter today and had to share. It raises some interesting questions for debate.

The feud seems to have been going on since Obama became president and seems to have no end in sight. Should one of these men rise above and break out the olive branch of peace for the community’s sake? One thing is for certain this feud is questioning our loyalties to Obama and our quest for self-preservation. How far do we go to support the first bi-racial president? Have we gone far enough? Is he helping us or hurting us?

A great open letter from Raynard Jackson

http://www.blacknews.com/news/open_letter_to_tom_joyner101.shtml

Open Letter To Tom Joyner, Regarding Criticism of Tavis Smiley and Cornel West

By Raynard Jackson

 

Nationwide (July 7, 2011) — I have known Tom Joyner (nationally syndicated radio host) for many years. We are not hanging out buddies, but we have always enjoyed talking and joking with each other. He is an “old school” soul who has done a lot of good in his life. But, in recent years, his very public fight with Tavis Smiley (journalist) and now Cornel West (college professor), threatens his standing in many communities (not just the Black). So, I decided to use this week’s column as an open letter to Tom.

Tom, it is well documented that you and Tavis Smiley (and now Cornel West) have had a very public falling out with each other. I have not been privy to all the details of the dispute, only what is being reported in the media and through some of our mutual friends – but I have no first hand knowledge of anything; so my comments will be offered with that as my backdrop.

Word on the street is that the falling out started during the presidential campaign in 2008. Tavis was clearly not a big supporter of Obama’s and was more of a supporter of Hillary Clinton’s. You were unabashedly quite vocal in your support of Obama.

So, after Tavis resigned (or you fired him from your radio show – I don’t know which one is more accurate), I thought the beef between the two of you would be over. Boy, was I wrong.

Last week you continued your public feud with Smiley and West and raised the rhetoric to an unhealthy level. To lay the blame at their feet for what Mark Halperin called President Obama is a bit of a stretch. This is what Joyner said, “But I’m even more disgusted with Smiley and West, two brothers who I did have expectations of – and thought I knew. These two have done much worse than what Halperin has done because they set the tone for it, opened the door to it, and must take much of the blame for creating a climate that would make a white, professional journalist feel comfortable verbally and vulgarly attacking the first black president of the United States.” (For the entire quote, go to www.blackamericaweb.com/?q=blog_inner/29954/1573138/Cheriewhite/1).

Halperin is editor of Time Magazine and a regular guest on MSNBC TV network. Last week, on live TV, he called President Obama a “dick.” He was immediately suspended indefinitely from the TV network (he did issue an apology).

Well, Tom, I could make the same argument against you about your blind support for Obama. It is well documented that I, as a Black Republican, voted for Obama in 2008. I was hopeful that he could and would deliver on the promises he made as a candidate; but just as important, use the historic nature of his presidency to bring a different perspective to some of the issues that have plagued the Black community. This is what I hear in West’s criticism of Obama. Smiley seems more angry and hateful and therefore I kind of tune him out. But West’s criticism is in sync with what I have been writing in my columns for the past two years.

So, Tom, can you really make a thoughtful argument for Obama’s reelection without injecting the name of Bush, Republicans, or racism?

Can you justify why Obama would meet with Marc Morial, Ben Jealous, or Al Sharpton, in February of last year to discuss the high unemployment rate in the Black community? These are three people who have never created one job. Did you not find this insulting? Do you think the president would have met with non practicing Jews to discuss Judaism?

Can you explain to me why you and the president support amnesty for the estimated 30 million illegals in the U.S.? Especially when around 7 million of these illegals will enter the workforce and compete with other low and under skilled people (mostly Blacks). If you are concerned with the high unemployment rate in the Black community, how then does this make sense?

Can you explain to me why you and the president are spending so much political capital pursuing a gay rights agenda even though most Blacks are against it?

But, when it comes to issues of particular concern to the Black community, the president’s response is, “I am president of all of America, not just a narrow special interest group.”

Where has the president expended any political capital on behalf of issues of particular interest to the Black community? So, the gays get all sorts of gay rights, Hispanics get a Supreme Court Justice, amnesty, and the D.R.E.A.M. Act; and Blacks folks get “I’m president of all of America.”

So, Tom, while you have done a lot of good in your life, especially with raising $55 million for Black college students, this does not give you a pass on your moral obligation to educate your listeners, not indoctrinate!

You are without doubt an apologist for Obama, but the worst thing you can do is continue to lead your audience into blind support for the president.

In your profession, if you don’t deliver certain demographics, you get fired. Next year Obama will face a similar standard. I challenge you to lay out your argument for Obama’s reelection based on substance, not race.

For you to continue to spew misinformation or incomplete information to your audience is more damaging than anything someone with a white hood over his head has ever done.

If you truly believe in liberalism (as you claim) when will you allow a free flowing exchange of information from both parties to take place on your show and in your town hall meetings?

You have made a name for yourself in the area of education, but when will your bring that reputation to your radio show?

Raynard Jackson is president & CEO of Raynard Jackson & Associates, LLC., a D.C.-public relations/government affairs firm. He is also a contributing editor for ExcellStyle Magazine (www.excellstyle.com) & USAfrica Magazine (www.USAfricaonline.com).

Black Media Silent About The NAACP


NAACP Milwaukee 1

The Milwaukee Chapter of the NAACP is the subject of this post. Some of what I’m going to write (reveal) about this organization has been reported before. However, the central question that I’m asking is different and just as important. So let’s get at it…

Our Subject: The NAACP – For months, members of the NAACP and current/former members of the Executive Committee have waged a covert civil war against President Jerry Ann Hamilton. These “Insiders” have released confidential information to reporters at the Journal Sentinel (Pabst, Kane, Causey) and other media outlets around Milwaukee. The Milwaukee Drum started receiving information a few weeks ago. The aforemention Georgia Pabst has authored a few highly critical (detailed) articles which included names, dates, and facts surrounding alledged financial mismanagement. President Hamilton, to our knowledge, has yet to refute much of what Pabst reported.

TMD has all of the same confidential documents that have been sent out including the ’08 Operational and Financial Assessment, the JAH Appreciation Luncheon Brochure (w/NAACP image), the President’s Report, the ’08 Executive Committee Minutes, and a grant application mentioned in various reports. A long email (we will post it in entirety) detailing specific accussations accompanied the documents which were sent to TMD. The email that these “Insiders” forwarded raises many, many questions. The biggest one for me is this (if true), why is the Black Media in Milwaukee so silent?

Our Question: Is the Black Media SilentWe asked our “Insider” that question and this was the reply. “Why are they silent? The black newspapers have become nothing but an advertising revenue sweat shop. NAACP is one of their consistent customers so they will not say anything bad about them.” Our “Insider” also went on to tell us that one Black newspaper’s editor was forced by its owner to write an apology piece chastising one of its writers for having wrote something negative about the NAACP. This was alleged to have happened after President Hamilton contacted the owner of the paper. If this is correct it is a sad day for discourse and journalism in Black Milwaukee.

How does a city with Black Radio Stations, Black Newspapers, and Black News Reporters fail to get to the truth of about the NAACP’s problems? Is it more important to let a truth go untold in order to protect an organization? Or is it heroic to report the facts and get answers to questions that may expose respected leaders for their failures? I believe the latter is always the direction one should take. Credit should be given to Earl Ingram, host of The Evening Rush 1290 WMCS, for at least confronting President Hamilton on-air with tough questions. We hope Ingram will doggedly go after the answers to his (our) questions.

TMD called the National Office of the NAACP to get answers to the issues surrounding the Milwaukee Branch. Our inquiries were rejected and we were told to contact the WI State office of the NAACP in Racine. TMD did leave a message and we are still waiting for a call back.

The silence of Black Media is shameful… if the press isn’t on the people’s side then who has the people’s back? Black Media has been the pulse of its community forever and is vital for getting information to the public that just doesn’t get covered in more mainstream outlets. Come on Black Media… force the NAACP to answer tough questions and hold them accountable. One of my favorite quotes reminds me of the power of Black Media and its responsiblity regarding this issue and others. I’ll leave you with it and let you meditate on what I mean.

“You can’t lead the people if you don’t love the people. You can’t save the people if you don’t serve the people.” Dr. Cornel West