Voter Fraud on Election Night

From Ieshuh Griffin

An election was underway in Milwaukee marked with extreme election fraud. After much thought and an in-depth review of the clearly established federal law, I (Ieshuh Griffin) filed an action in the United States Eastern District of Wisconsin seeking injunctive, as well as declaratory relief as it relates.

In my race for example, candidates were on the ballot that did not reside in the district and could not vote for themselves. There were other issues I had with this particular race as well, as detailed in the complaint.

I also brought up the “integrity” of the voting machines used and the manipulation of such machines, which have the ability to reduce 1,000 votes to 1 vote and increase 1 vote to a 1,000 votes within minutes of the actual results coming in. Last night concrete evidence inadvertently came in on a national local news media website that supports this fact. These “before manipulated” results were visible for a lengthy duration, however  television media outlets attempted to portray the results as “slowly” coming in, when in fact the votes were already in and the machine manipulation was underway. Although the TRUE election results were inadvertently released. When I placed a call to media rooms in regards to the “before manipulation” results that were STILL visible, immediately after my call the web page went blank for a short length of time. The votes have been intentionally suppressed and were done so by intentional manipulation.

 

As it relates to my particular race, I will also argue in court, the “before manipulation” results show 1) a woman who was not eligible to be on the ballot as the winner 2) a woman who suspended her race, who also did not reside  in the district came in second. Republicans and so forth voted for her because she stated she conceded to Millie Coby. She would not have been able to take a seat in which she verbally suspended her campaign. This left Coby and myself. I received more votes than Coby in the “before manipulation” results and as such I will argue that these true results stand.

Please note that I have the “before manipulation” results in its entirety. Due to the length of time it would take to paste and post I am sharing selected clear copies.

Thank you for your attention in this matter.

Ieshuh Griffin

 

If people who are seriously interested in following up in this matter and would like to assist, I would appreciate if you contact me and I can forward that information to Ms. Griffin unless she wants to comment below and share her information instead.

Peace Family,

WW

 

Results BEFORE machine manipulation: (notice the 100% reported)

 

Results AFTER machine manipulation: (notice the 100% reported)

Results BEFORE machine manipulation: (notice the 100% reported)

Results AFTER machine manipulation: (notice the 100% reported)

Results BEFORE machine manipulation: (notice the 100% reported)

Results AFTER machine manipulation: (notice the 100% reported)

Results BEFORE machine manipulation: (notice the 100% reported)

Results AFTER machine manipulation: (notice the 100% reported)

 

Results BEFORE machine manipulation: (notice the 100% reported)

Results AFTER machine manipulation: (notice the 100% reported)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements